In which sentence is the predicate nominative correct. A it is I B it is me C this is her D that is us.


Answer 1

c. this is her.

I think.

Related Questions


Walt Whitman was an American poet, journalist, and he also wrote essays. Which revision most effectively corrects the faulty parallelism in the sentence?

1. Walt Whitman, an American, not only wrote poetry but also essays and newspaper stories.
2. American Walt Whitman wrote poetry as well as writing for newspapers and essays.
3. Walt Whitman was an American poet, journalist, and essayist.
4. American poet Walt Whitman wrote for newspapers and also essays.


"Walt Whitman was an American poet, journalist, and essayist" is the one among the following revisions that most effectively corrects the faulty parallelism in the sentence. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option or option "C". I hope the answer helps you. 

3. Walt Whitman was an American poet, journalist, and essayist.

Parallelism is the repetition of the same grammatical structure in a list of corresponding ideas. In the original sentence the author begins Walt Whitman's career titles as nouns, and then changes the last one to an independent clause. To fix the problem, the independent clause needs to change to a noun that means "he wrote essays." An author of essays is an essayist. This is the correct revision to create appropriate parallelism.


I NEED help quick! I need atleast 2 paragraphs talking about any book that you like. It can be why you like it and stuff like that


i truly enjoy the book Fangirl by Rainbow Rowell. It truly relates to me in a deep level, as i am a college student, who wrote fan fiction and is 33% made p of anxiety. It explains how there is dysfunctional families out there and it creates a comfort for me where i can see that my family is not the only one out there in deep trouble no one else knows. I remember starting to read the book in 7th grade (for the first time) and realizing that for the first time i could relate to a character, they were no hero, and no pretty girl that i would never be. They were humans. Cather from Fangirl was a human. And one of the most relateable ones out there.

Fangirl was a great hit to heart for me because aside from the character and her family there was love in it. The protagonist falls in love with another character, and as a little girl, dreaming to be happy with someone, Fangirl truly captured that magic of love. Bunches of years later, im in college, i have  a serious relationship with a charming boy, and i quote the things stated i Fangirl. The book gave me hope as a child, and i gladly live to it and read it religiously because it gave me a warmth in my stomach nothing ever could.

fix it and tweak it as you like. i just ranted


What is explicit meaning?


stated clearly and in detail, leaving no room for confusion or doubt.

Which of the following would best quickly show the differences between two detailed subjects? A clear heading and title
A chronological organization
A table listing key information
A long explanation of differences



C.) A table listing key information


We can rule D out because the question asked for the differences provided quickly. A clear heading and a title could show at least one difference but that's it. So we can rule A out too. chronological organization is great if your trying to make a timeline, not so much as for contrasting text. After ruling out B, that leaves us with "A table listing key information". So our answer is C.

Random Questions
what is the tone of the passage? The Monkey's Paw by W. W. Jacobs (excerpt) At the foot of the stairs the match went out, and he paused to strike another; and at the same moment a knock, so quiet and stealthy as to be scarcely audible, sounded on the front door. The matches fell from his hand and spilled in the passage. He stood motionless, his breath suspended until the knock was repeated. Then he turned and fled swiftly back to his room, and closed the door behind him. A third knock sounded through the house. "What's that?" cried the old woman, starting up. "A rat," said the old man in shaking tones—"a rat. It passed me on the stairs." His wife sat up in bed listening. A loud knock resounded through the house. "It's Herbert!" she screamed. "It's Herbert!" She ran to the door, but her husband was before her, and catching her by the arm, held her tightly. "What are you going to do?" he whispered hoarsely. "It's my boy; it's Herbert!" she cried, struggling mechanically. "I forgot it was two miles away. What are you holding me for? Let go. I must open the door." "For God's sake don't let it in," cried the old man, trembling. "You're afraid of your own son," she cried, struggling. "Let me go. I'm coming, Herbert; I'm coming." There was another knock, and another. The old woman with a sudden wrench broke free and ran from the room. Her husband followed to the landing, and called after her appealingly as she hurried downstairs. He heard the chain rattle back and the bottom bolt drawn slowly and stiffly from the socket. Then the old woman's voice, strained and panting. "The bolt," she cried, loudly. "Come down. I can't reach it." But her husband was on his hands and knees groping wildly on the floor in search of the paw. If he could only find it before the thing outside got in. A perfect fusillade of knocks reverberated through the house, and he heard the scraping of a chair as his wife put it down in the passage against the door. He heard the creaking of the bolt as it came slowly back, and at the same moment he found the monkey's paw, and frantically breathed his third and last wish. The knocking ceased suddenly, although the echoes of it were still in the house. He heard the chair drawn back, and the door opened. A cold wind rushed up the staircase, and a long loud wail of disappointment and misery from his wife gave him courage to run down to her side, and then to the gate beyond. The street lamp flickering opposite shone on a quiet and deserted road.